This is the twelfth and final post in a series produced for studying purposes.
This reflective statement is meant to be a little more touchy-feely than the evaluative statement. However, I feel there is a need for a little background before I launch into it…
To say that I wasn’t prepared to go back to study would be an understatement. I had originally enrolled with my best mate and planned to study two units per semester to complete the four units I needed to do by the end of this year. I then realised I was horribly overcommitted and dropped one. The unit I kept should have been a walk in the park for me, someone that already works with social media.
Regardless, INF506 – Social Networking for Information Professionals – was a definitely a learning experience for me. I learnt that I poorly manage my own information streams. I follow too many people on Twitter, I have too many “friends” on Facebook and I probably have a Dunbar number for RunKeeper too.
Right, that’s enough of the flagellation…
I came in to this unit already knowing a thing or two about practical applications of social media. I came out knowing that I didn’t know as much as I thought I knew. Are you still with me?
First and foremost, I learnt a little bit about social media policy. I long thought that social media policies were a daft idea and all social media issues governed by existing IT and PR policies. To some degree, I still hold that opinion, but it’s been tempered by the realisation that sometimes a single, clear-cut policy to deal with a particular issue is better than having many different policies governing one thing.
Furthermore, I originally thought that policies should not be used in lieu of common sense. This has been replaced with an understanding for the need of policies to protect people, not just govern them. For example, it’s all well and good to delete a trolling post, but if that troll then continues to stir up trouble and scream about “freedom of speech” (which we do not have in Australia, anyway), it’s far easier to point to the policy rather than argue with them, which could be bad for business, or ignore them and let them continue their rant, which could also be bad for business.
I’ve decided to shed some of my conservatism when it comes to suggesting experimental technologies at work. I try to temper enthusiasm with a little bit of accountability – thinking of things like cost overheads and budgets. I think that comes from my previous study in computer science and desire to please IT managers. It used to be that IT was considered a cutting-edge field, but now IT departments are certainly extremely conservative.
Sod it! We should have a budget for experimentation. I’m going to try and argue for it. I might even write a business case. A business case to possibly throw money away? Ask me how it went in six months.
Now don’t get me wrong, I don’t think that we should be carelessly experimenting for the fear fun of it without having any sort of direction. Social technographics is something that I’d really like to learn more about. I’ve previously mentioned the copy of Groundswell sitting on my desk, I think I’ll actually make an effort to read it. I’ll even go so far as to ignore social media whiling I’m reading this book about social media.
So where does that leave me? A little wiser and little more courageous, I think.